Skip to main content

Markdown vs WYSIWYG in Confluence — When to Pick Which

· 12 min read

Confluence has been the go-to knowledge base and documentation platform for thousands of organizations. At its core, Confluence uses a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor that lets users format content visually -- clicking toolbar buttons for headings, bold text, tables, and macros without writing a single line of markup.

But an increasing number of teams are asking a different question: can we write Confluence content in Markdown instead?

Markdown is a lightweight plain-text formatting syntax originally created by John Gruber in 2004. It has become the default writing format for developers, technical writers, and content teams who work with Git repositories, static site generators, and API documentation. Its appeal is simple: you focus on structure and meaning rather than visual styling, and the formatted output is generated automatically.

Teams choose Markdown over WYSIWYG for several compelling reasons. Developer-heavy teams often already write in Markdown daily -- in README files, pull request descriptions, and documentation repos. Switching to a WYSIWYG editor for Confluence pages feels like a step backward. Markdown content is also plain text, which means it works seamlessly with version control systems like Git, diff tools, and automated pipelines. Finally, Markdown files are portable; the same .md file can be published to GitHub, a static site, or a Confluence page without reformatting.

On the other hand, WYSIWYG editing remains the better choice for non-technical users who prefer visual feedback, drag-and-drop file attachments, and toolbar-driven formatting. Many business teams have no interest in learning syntax rules, no matter how lightweight.

This FAQ addresses the most common questions teams have when evaluating Markdown versus WYSIWYG editing in Confluence, and explains how Enhanced Markdown for Confluence by NGPILOT bridges the gap between both worlds.

Export Jira Issues to CSV/Excel: Common Problems & FAQ

· 11 min read
Who should read this
  • Jira admins exporting issues for migration, reporting, or compliance
  • Engineering/ops leads hitting timeouts or field mismatches on large exports
  • Anyone who needs >1,000 issues out of Jira in one go
What you'll learn
  1. How to fix CSV field mismatches, encoding errors, and date formats
  2. How to export custom fields and >1,000 issues without timeouts
  3. What to do with attachments (they don't come with a CSV)
  4. How to automate recurring exports

Exporting Jira issues sounds simple until you try it at scale. Jira's native CSV export works for small result sets, but teams quickly hit field mismatches, encoding errors, custom field headaches, timeouts on large projects, and the question of what to do with attachments. This FAQ walks through each common problem and the practical fix — most of which Simple Bulk Issues Excel CSV Export for Jira handles out of the box.

Are Confluence & Jira Plugins Safe? Marketplace App Security Guide

· 11 min read
Who should read this
  • Cloud admins evaluating Marketplace apps before install
  • Security/compliance teams running vendor risk reviews for Atlassian
  • Procurement needing a plugin security checklist for SOC 2 / ISO 27001
What you'll learn
  1. The Forge vs Connect security model difference (where your data lives)
  2. How to read app scopes and spot overprivileged apps
  3. What Cloud Fortified actually verifies
  4. A copy-paste plugin security checklist for vendor reviews

Confluence Code Block Themes — Dark Mode, Monaco Editor & 85+ Languages

· 5 min read

Confluence code block themes let you customize how code appears in your documentation. The built-in code macro offers limited theme support, but third-party apps bring dark mode, syntax highlighting, and VS Code-like editing to Confluence.

This guide compares the best Confluence code block apps for syntax highlighting, including Modern Code Blocks, Better Code Macro, and Prism Syntax Highlighter. Learn which one fits your team's needs for Confluence code block themes, language support, and developer experience.

Best Confluence Import/Export Apps Compared — 2026 Guide

· 7 min read

Teams move content in and out of Confluence every day — migrating between instances, backing up documentation, importing from other tools, exporting for offline review. Confluence has basic PDF and HTML export built in, but it's limited. No bulk operations, no multi-format support, no structured import workflow.

Over a dozen marketplace apps try to fill this gap, but most solve one narrow problem: PDF export, Word import, or Markdown conversion. We built Modern Importer & Exporter for Confluence to handle both directions — import and export — across multiple formats. In this post we compare it against every alternative on the Atlassian Marketplace.

Enhanced Markdown vs Other Confluence Markdown Apps — Feature Matrix

· 7 min read

Developers write in Markdown. Confluence doesn't. Every engineering team that moves from GitHub wikis, README files, or Hugo docs to Confluence hits the same wall — the rich text editor feels slow, and there's no way to write in the format they already know.

Several marketplace apps bring Markdown to Confluence, but they take different approaches. Some embed Markdown as macros. Others import Markdown files. A few offer live editing. We built Enhanced Markdown for Confluence to give teams a full WYSIWYG Markdown editor with code highlighting, charts, UML diagrams, and table merging — all inside the Confluence page editor. In this post we compare it against every alternative.