Skip to main content

12 posts tagged with "comparison"

View All Tags

How to Choose a Markdown Editor for Confluence

· 6 min read
Quick Answer

Confluence has no native Markdown editor. To write pages in Markdown you need a Marketplace app. The right choice depends on how your team works: occasional converters need a simple paste tool; engineering teams writing specs, docs, and equations daily need a full Markdown macro with live preview, math, and diagram support.

What you'll learn
  1. Why Confluence needs a Markdown app (and what happens without one)
  2. The four categories of Markdown tools for Confluence
  3. A decision framework for picking the right one
  4. What features matter most for technical vs non-technical teams

Developers, technical writers, and data scientists think in Markdown. READMEs, API docs, pull request descriptions, and design specs are all written in it. But Confluence — where most of that knowledge ends up living — has no native Markdown support. Pasting Markdown into the WYSIWYG editor produces broken tables, literal asterisks, and lost formatting. This guide walks through the options so you can pick the right Markdown approach for your team without trial and error.

Jira vs Confluence: What Each Is Actually For (with Examples)

· 9 min read
Quick Answer

Jira and Confluence are two different Atlassian products that are often bought together but solve fundamentally different problems. Jira tracks work — issues, sprints, backlogs, and workflows. Confluence documents knowledge — pages, decisions, specs, and team context. They connect natively so an issue and the page explaining it stay linked. Use Jira for "what are we doing and who is doing it," and Confluence for "why are we doing it and how does it work."

What you'll learn
  1. The core purpose of each product (with a one-line definition you can repeat)
  2. What Jira is good at and bad at
  3. What Confluence is good at and bad at
  4. How they connect natively
  5. A practical decision guide: which tool for which task

Jira and Confluence are the two products most people picture when they hear "Atlassian." They are frequently sold together, deeply integrated, and yet regularly confused — even by teams that use both every day. This guide explains what each is actually for, where each one shines and struggles, and how to decide which tool a given piece of work belongs in. The goal is to give you a mental model you can apply to any task, not a feature checklist.

Mermaid vs PlantUML vs Graphviz for Confluence: Which Diagram Tool to Choose

· 7 min read
Quick Answer

Mermaid, PlantUML, and Graphviz are the three most popular text-based diagramming languages. Mermaid is the easiest to learn and covers the widest range (29 diagram types). PlantUML excels at detailed UML with precise notation control. Graphviz is best for technical network and dependency graphs. Most Confluence teams should start with Mermaid and add Graphviz for network diagrams if needed.

What you'll learn
  1. The strengths and weaknesses of each tool
  2. Which diagram types each one supports
  3. How easy each is to learn and use
  4. A practical recommendation for Confluence teams

Text-based diagramming — writing a few lines of code that render into a diagram — is how modern teams keep diagrams in sync with their documentation. No more drawing boxes by hand in Visio, exporting screenshots, and pasting them into Confluence where they go stale. With text-based diagrams, you edit the source and the diagram redraws instantly.

But there are three major text-based diagramming languages, and they are not interchangeable. Each has different strengths, different syntax, and different ideal use cases. This guide compares Mermaid, PlantUML, and Graphviz so you can choose the right one (or combination) for your Confluence team.

Best Confluence Apps & Plugins in 2026 — Developer Tools Compared

· 5 min read

Developer teams use Confluence differently than marketing or HR. You document APIs, share architecture diagrams, write runbooks, and collaborate on code reviews. The default Confluence editor works, but it wasn't built for technical documentation.

This guide covers the best Confluence apps for developers in 2026, organized by use case. We built several of these apps at NGPILOT, so we'll be transparent about where our apps fit and where competitors offer better solutions.

Confluence Font Apps Compared: Google Fonts vs Custom Fonts Pro

· 11 min read

Confluence ships with a fixed set of system fonts. For most teams that works fine, but if your company has brand guidelines, an accessibility requirement for specific typefaces, or simply wants documentation that looks polished and professional, the default typography falls short.

The Atlassian Marketplace now offers several apps that let you use custom fonts on your Confluence pages. But with different feature sets, pricing models, and levels of maturity, choosing the right one takes more than a quick glance at star ratings.

This post compares the leading Confluence custom font apps side by side so you can make an informed decision for your team.

Confluence Source Editor Compared — Free vs Pro

· 11 min read

Confluence stores every page as XML in a format called "Confluence storage format." Most users never see it. But if you have ever tried to fix a broken macro, remove hidden formatting artifacts, or bulk-edit repetitive markup, you know the rich text editor alone is not enough. You need direct access to the underlying source.

At NGPILOT, we built two apps for exactly this purpose: Raw Storage Source Editor for Confluence (free) and Raw Storage Source Editor Pro for Confluence (paid). Both let you open, view, and edit the raw XML behind any Confluence page. This post compares them feature by feature so you can pick the right one for your team.

Running Design Whiteboarding Sessions in Confluence — Why We Picked Excalidraw over draw.io

· 12 min read

When teams need to add diagrams to Confluence, two tools come up again and again: Excalidraw and draw.io (also known as diagrams.net). Both are popular Confluence diagram apps on the Atlassian Marketplace, but they take fundamentally different approaches to visual communication — and picking the wrong one wastes time and licensing budget.

The short version: for live whiteboarding, brainstorming, and freeform sketching, Excalidraw wins. For formal, finalized diagrams (UML, network topology, BPMN), draw.io is the better fit. Most teams end up needing both — and the rest of this post is the honest, feature-by-feature comparison so you can make the right call for your workflow.

Who should read this
  • Product/design teams deciding between Excalidraw and draw.io for whiteboarding
  • Eng leads choosing a diagramming tool for architecture sketches and UML
  • Anyone comparing the two for freeform vs structured diagramming